I hope you appreciate that I am eDating for YOU. Specifically because Travis complained that I wasn’t posting.
Thursday, December 14th, 2006This may come as a surprise, given the title of my last post, but yesterday I decided to give eHarmony a try (you can cancel your membership for a full refund within the first week).
So far, I have been rejected by five people to whom I have never spoken. I didn’t expect eDating to be so much like junior high.
I actually think that being able to “close” matches at one’s own discretion is a good idea. It’s very annoying to be cruising, say, OKCupid and getting the same top ten list of people every time, three of whom are taken, one of whom you work with, and five of the remaining six of whom strike you as indistinctly, yet definitely, off-putting. And they just keep reappearing.
Two of the people who closed me out said that they were “pursuing another relationship,” so it’s good to have that option, too.
Actually, I was wondering if I was going to be one of the people that eHarmony identifies as “unmatchable.” I’ve known several people who proclaimed that this had happened to them. They chose to put it forth as a kind of badge of honor, which I’m sure I would, too, if eHarmony said I was “unmatchable.” They don’t come out and say that you are destined for the shelf and had better get some cats; they just say that you are too weird for their algorithms.
You know what they mean.
It wasn’t really surprising that I was not unmatchable. I have always felt that my basic interpersonal needs and desires were pretty simple, although why I persist in attempting to meet them with the Ugly Sweaters of Personhood* onto whom I routinely latch on, I cannot say. As I commented to my friend frippy recently, I will be lucky if my next boyfriend is not a 50-year-old research scientist with Asperger’s permanently stationed in Antarctica.**
Anyway, given that last year’s project (weight loss, remember?) was so successful, I was thinking that maybe I should attempt to improve another area of my life with a little technological assistance. I do occasionally cruise OkCupid, but I figure that a site that actually charges money (and boy howdy, do they; you may be surprised how much) weeds out a lot of the timewasters in the beginning. Also, I have that week to cancel my membership. If eHarmony cannot produce anyone intriguing in that time frame, I will just cancel and move on to Plan B, which probably involves joining a book club or something.***
I will say that thus far, things are not looking great for eHarmony. One guy referred to the most influential people in his life as his “personal board of directors.” Then again, perhaps my disdain for this kind of metaphor is why I keep ending up with neurotic manboys. Maybe.
I’ll tell you one thing: I once went on a blind date with a guy who told me that he only read books if he “couldn’t understand the movie.”
This will still be grounds for immediate dismissal.
—
*I’ve been saying for awhile now that my tendency to love sweaters that are so hideous they are cute is okay when applied to sweaters, but not so great when translated into “that guy over there is so emotionally damaged that I am powerless to resist him! Perhaps he’d like me to write a volume of poetry about him!”
**frippy says that in this case, I have to stop blaming Luke Perry/Dylan McKay for my fatal attraction to the terminally unsuitable and start blaming that childhood crush on Mr. Spock, who is older, Vulcan, and lives in space.
***Craigslist ads for love are down at AT LEAST Plan F.